Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Alpine #54

Closed
st-schneider opened this issue May 3, 2019 · 10 comments
Closed

Support Alpine #54

st-schneider opened this issue May 3, 2019 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
containers Issue in vscode-remote containers plan-item A plan item
Milestone

Comments

@st-schneider
Copy link

Issue Type: Bug

Please add support for alpine images

Extension version: 0.12.0
VS Code version: Code - Insiders 1.34.0-insider (473af338e1bd9ad4d9853933da1cd9d5d9e07dc9, 2019-05-01T00:21:48.884Z)
OS version: Darwin x64 17.7.0

System Info
Item Value
CPUs Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4980HQ CPU @ 2.80GHz (8 x 2800)
GPU Status 2d_canvas: enabled
checker_imaging: disabled_off
flash_3d: enabled
flash_stage3d: enabled
flash_stage3d_baseline: enabled
gpu_compositing: enabled
multiple_raster_threads: enabled_on
native_gpu_memory_buffers: enabled
rasterization: enabled
surface_synchronization: enabled_on
video_decode: enabled
webgl: enabled
webgl2: enabled
Load (avg) 3, 4, 4
Memory (System) 16.00GB (0.23GB free)
Process Argv
Screen Reader no
VM 0%
@egamma egamma added the feature-request Request for new features or functionality label May 3, 2019
@chrmarti chrmarti added the containers Issue in vscode-remote containers label May 3, 2019
@Ilhicas
Copy link

Ilhicas commented May 3, 2019

This would be highly appreciated.

image

@lnikell
Copy link

lnikell commented May 6, 2019

if that's possible to solve by installing some libraries inside the container, let us know, please.

@egamma
Copy link
Member

egamma commented May 7, 2019

@lnikell

if that's possible to solve by installing some libraries inside the container, let us know, please.

It is not possible to fix this by installing additional libraries, sorry.

@MarkKoester
Copy link

Does anyone know what the current plans are for supporting Alpine? Is this something that's currently being worked on? Is there a timeline for when support is expected?

@b01
Copy link

b01 commented May 30, 2019

Is it possible to get an explanation of why this extension does not work with Alpine?

@Chuxel
Copy link
Member

Chuxel commented May 30, 2019

@b01 In short: Alpine is musl based instead of glibc, which means that there's work to do to ensure native components work properly. It's the same problem as #423.

@chrmarti
Copy link
Contributor

Available in 0.63.0 of the Remote Containers extension. This currently needs the latest Insiders build: https://code.visualstudio.com/insiders/

@chrmarti chrmarti added plan-item A plan item and removed feature-request Request for new features or functionality labels Jun 24, 2019
@chrmarti chrmarti mentioned this issue Jun 24, 2019
2 tasks
@chrmarti
Copy link
Contributor

chrmarti commented Jun 28, 2019

Note that for now Alpine support will only be available with VS Code Insiders (https://code.visualstudio.com/insiders/) and not in the upcoming VS Code 1.36.

We keep this back so extension authors have time to adapt to the additional platform. Many extensions will not need any adoption, but some have native OS dependencies and will require updating and testing.

@st-schneider
Copy link
Author

Already enjoying the alpine support in the insiders version.

@terry-fei
Copy link

can not run
Server did not start successfully. Full server log >>>

/home/afei/.vscode-server-insiders/bin/0f3794b38477eea13fb47fbe15a42798e6129338/server.sh: line 12: /home/afei/.vscode-server-insiders/bin/0f3794b38477eea13fb47fbe15a42798e6129338/node: not found
<<< End of server log

@vscodebot vscodebot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 5, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
containers Issue in vscode-remote containers plan-item A plan item
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants