Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2025. It is now read-only.

Feature Request: Add invalid CSS theming for required fields #270

Closed
yannickowow opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Add invalid CSS theming for required fields #270

yannickowow opened this issue Oct 18, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@yannickowow
Copy link

Feature/component description

Implement VS Code error background/foreground/text color for required components

Use case

If a field is not fulfilled with valid contents, components should be able to show to the user the invalid state.
Please provide a use case to help us understand your request in context.

Screenshots/references

Reference: https://developer.mozilla.org/fr/docs/Web/CSS/:invalid

Thanks :)

@yannickowow yannickowow added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 18, 2021
@daviddossett
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @yannickowow. We have an item to implement validation/hints for some inputs on our radar. I'll fold this under that work.

@daviddossett daviddossett added this to the v1.0 milestone Oct 18, 2021
@hawkticehurst hawkticehurst modified the milestones: General Availability (v1.0), Backlog Dec 9, 2021
@crhenrici
Copy link

Is this still planned to be implemented?

@hawkticehurst
Copy link
Member

Hi all,

I'm very sorry to say that the toolkit is being deprecated and all active development will be coming to a close.

There was an announcement last week where you can learn more details and leave any questions or comments you may have.

Beyond that, thank you so much filing this issue and apologies for never getting around to addressing it. It means a lot that you contributed to the improvement of this project. I wish you all the best in your future VS Code extension endeavors!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants