Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Search Facility (include/exclude fields to handle regex usage and history for fields) #46294

Closed
LordHog opened this issue Mar 21, 2018 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature-request Request for new features or functionality *out-of-scope Posted issue is not in scope of VS Code search Search widget and operation issues

Comments

@LordHog
Copy link

LordHog commented Mar 21, 2018

Hello,

I have a couple feature request for the search facility within VSC.

  1. Be able to using regex for specifying files. For example, one of the common search filters I have is ".c,.h,.py", but I would like to use the form of ".(c|h|py)".

  2. Each of the fields needs to have a history of previous entries and can be configurable to list how many entries I would like to store.

  3. Having the ability to specify and store common filters that I use and toggle between. As of now, I need to keep my filter expressions in a text file since there is no history and no way to store frequently used filters.

Regards,
Mark

@vscodebot vscodebot bot added the search Search widget and operation issues label Mar 21, 2018
@roblourens
Copy link
Member

  1. You can do something like this with glob patterns, like .{c,h,py}. Regex is not likely to happen.
  2. You can access the history for each field with alt+up/down arrow.
  3. Besides the history, I don't know of an existing feature request for this one

@roblourens roblourens added the feature-request Request for new features or functionality label Mar 22, 2018
@LordHog
Copy link
Author

LordHog commented Mar 22, 2018

@roblourens given the command sequence was not obvious, would it still be possible to place little chevrons to indicate to the user they can cycle through them. Still, I much rather see a drop down list than having to cycle through each one individually and have the ability to specify how many entries I want to have.

Thanks a lot for bringing to my attention the glob patterns and the key-board commands!!

@roblourens
Copy link
Member

I am tracking the request for something like a dropdown here - #23099

@LordHog
Copy link
Author

LordHog commented Mar 22, 2018

@roblourens Thanks. I had did a search looking for the keyword "search", but didn't see anything. Seems the term used for this item is "find". I guess I should had used that keyword also. Glad to see there is an action item already for it and hopefully it gets implemented (though this request is now a year old).

@roblourens roblourens added the *out-of-scope Posted issue is not in scope of VS Code label Sep 12, 2018
@vscodebot
Copy link

vscodebot bot commented Sep 12, 2018

This iteration we focus on issue grooming. This issue is being closed to keep the number of issues in our inbox on a manageable level, we are closing issues that are not going to be addressed in the foreseeable future: We look at the number of votes the issue has received and the number of duplicate issues filed. More details here. If you disagree and feel that this issue is crucial: We are happy to listen and to reconsider.

If you wonder what we are up to, please see our roadmap and issue reporting guidelines.

Thanks for your understanding and happy coding!

@vscodebot vscodebot bot closed this as completed Sep 12, 2018
@LordHog
Copy link
Author

LordHog commented Sep 12, 2018

I am very sad not to see this feature be considered as it would aid to searching the code base much easier.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request Request for new features or functionality *out-of-scope Posted issue is not in scope of VS Code search Search widget and operation issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants