-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to target another repo with hub command #2338
Comments
There were feature requests floating around for a while proposing across-the-board support for overriding the repo (or specifying another git remote) for any hub command, which would then include It could work something like this: Would this solve your use case? |
Overriding repo for any command would be ideal, yes. Thank you. |
Today is the first day that I've tried the In fact I find it a limitation that the github WebUI requires repository I don't understand why In other words, I suspect (and worry) that this isn't a problem with just the |
@lersek I cannot follow what you've describe really well, but you're right that you can't open a Pull Request on GitHub from a repo that isn't a github-fork (or, at least, in the same "network" of forks), even if their git repositories technically share the same object history. |
@mislav are you working on this actively? I want this so bad that I may try to do it. |
@gvela024 Go right ahead! 🙏 |
@mislav cool. Realistically, with how exciting stuff is at work right now, I probably won't finish something until by the end of the year (also given that I've never written anything in Go so yeah....). I'll let you know if I won't be able to do it. |
bump? 🙃 |
hub issue show organization/repository#1234
hub pr show organization/repository#1234
Or something with even more brevity depending on your context/git config would be nice. Our company works across many repositories but cannot always guarantee that our assigned issues are created in the "correct" repo, because... no real excuse. However, point still stands, I think.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: