We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given the following Markdown involving four headings, md2html's and cmark's results diverged on the third and fourth headings.
Mardown:
# _h _ # _h _[](<#_h%20_>) # _h _[](<#h-_>) # _h _[](<#h__>)
md2html 0.5.2 output (Linux):
<h1>_h _</h1> <h1>_h _<a href="#_h%20_"></a></h1> <h1>_h <em><a href="#h-_"></a></h1> <h1><em>h <em><a href="#h__"></a></h1>
cmark 0.31.1 output:
<h1>_h _</h1> <h1>_h _<a href="#_h%20_"></a></h1> <h1>_h _<a href="#h-_"></a></h1> <h1>_h _<a href="#h__"></a></h1>
On a side note: in the third tag md2html opened an <em> tag without closing it. I guess that's expected since MD4C doesn't validate by design.
<em>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Given the following Markdown involving four headings, md2html's and cmark's results diverged on the third and fourth headings.
Mardown:
md2html 0.5.2 output (Linux):
cmark 0.31.1 output:
On a side note: in the third tag md2html opened an
<em>
tag without closing it. I guess that's expected since MD4C doesn't validate by design.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: