Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: check and watch should display the same service names #101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2022

Conversation

ramfox
Copy link
Contributor

@ramfox ramfox commented May 31, 2022

Adds more formalization to the different service names. We can now
expect that the SERVICE_NAMEs (aka the name that tonic_health
assigns each service) is the string on which we need to fetch the
health status from tonic_health, and nothing more.

Once we start turning those responses into StatusRows and
StatusTables, we can expect only display names to exist.

closes n0-computer/beetle#260

@ramfox ramfox self-assigned this May 31, 2022
@ramfox ramfox added the fix Fixes a bug label May 31, 2022
@ramfox ramfox requested a review from dignifiedquire May 31, 2022 18:26
Adds more formalization to the different service names. We can now
expect that the `SERVICE_NAME`s (aka the name that `tonic_health`
assigns each service) is the string on which we need to fetch the
health status from `tonic_health`, and nothing more.

Once we start turning those responses into `StatusRow`s and
`StatusTable`s, we can expect only display names to exist.
@ramfox ramfox merged commit ef99fe5 into n0-computer:main May 31, 2022
@ramfox ramfox deleted the status_fix branch May 31, 2022 20:01
dignifiedquire pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix Fixes a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug(iroh-ctl): different service names, depending on the command
2 participants