-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add gemBS option #387
Comments
hi @seynard could you provide any links to gemBS and why you think it will be a good addition to methylseq ? |
Hi @sateeshperi, actually I'm not sure gemBS would be the best addition, maybe BISCUIT could also be one, we are working on finding the best tool for our purpose but the idea would be to have, in parallel of the methylation calling also the variant calling from bisulfite sequencing data and as these tools do both they could be nice additions to the general pipeline. We are in the process of testing them and seeing if they answer well our purpose. |
I have biscuit on my roadmap. Let me know if you want to work together to integrate it. reach out on slack. thank you |
Dear Sateesh, super that it's already on your road map, we also found this fork that have already developed it https://github.com/ekushele/methylseq but a colleague (Rémi Séraphin) and I would definitely be happy to contribute to that so let us know how we can arrange ourselves to help out :) |
Description of feature
Hi, I really like using the nf-core MethylSeq but recently we've been wanting to test gemBS to analyse our RRBS data. We are wondering if this tool could be added to the pipeline as an alternative to Bismark or BWAMeth?
Thanks in advance for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: