-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include ODRL based policy part #19
Comments
I'm not sure if this is the right place to discuss this (probably rather here), but what is the advantage over simple license files? This might be a very basic question, I am not an expert on this topic. Can you elaborate on this, @HLWeil? Regarding the technical part, I don't see a big issue here. I'm not a big fan of making the investigation a |
The advantage is twofold:
Sorry for the confusion. The ARC/Investigation is not a
Well the diagram is not necessarily about importance, just placement. It refers to the whole ARC, so why put it somewhere else? |
Parallel to the plans of including an ODRL file in the ARC Scaffold, there should also be an alternative part in the ARC RO-Crate.
This should be pretty straight forward. The ODRL file will be formatted in
JSON-LD
and the top-level object will be a policy (i.e. a collection of rules). We could reference this ODRL part from the RO-Crate root dataset through the hasPolicy property.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: