-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove Ubuntu 12.04 #961
Comments
No reason not to remove IMO. On the other hand if they're not having issues is there a reason to remove them? I'd be tempted to leave them, and just remove them from any jobs that have issues with them. We can retire them when they become an annoyance to maintain. |
Yeah, I'm pretty OK with this approach. As long as (a) we can continue to keep them maintained and (b) we don't lose the infra cause we can't start a new Ubuntu 12.04 on any of our providers if we needed it. |
Two reasons to remove:
|
Only if it fails. And if it fails then yes, time to remove. |
https://www.ubuntu.com/support/esm
Apparently this is working out really well for Ubuntu and they are expanding ESM to all LTS lines and expanding the range of packages they are supporting beyond just |
Waiting on update from @rvagg, removing agenda tag until there is one. |
Closing as stale, but if anyone wants to take this up feel free to reopen. |
EOL in April of this year.
We have 3 machines, Host test-digitalocean-ubuntu1204-x64-1, test-digitalocean-ubuntu1204-x64-2 and test-rackspace-ubuntu1204_clang341-x64-1.
It's in 40 of our Jenkins jobs and 20 of those have the
ubuntu1204
and/orubuntu1204-clang341-64
label as nodes to be run on.Is there a reason we're delaying removing this that anyone can think of? How about libuv? /cc @saghul
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: