Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 21, 2018. It is now read-only.

Rename this repo #356

Closed
snostorm opened this issue May 17, 2015 · 15 comments
Closed

Rename this repo #356

snostorm opened this issue May 17, 2015 · 15 comments

Comments

@snostorm
Copy link
Contributor

Post merge this repo may need to be renamed or branched to account for:

  • iojs.org
  • nodejs.org (current)
  • post-merge nodejs.org

Possibilities (for this repo)

  • nodejs/iojs-org
  • nodejs/iojs.org
  • nodejs/website-iojs
  • etc.
@snostorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cross-linked to our next WG meeting agenda #352

@yosuke-furukawa
Copy link
Member

FYI: nodejs/evangelism#79

@yosuke-furukawa
Copy link
Member

cc: @marocchino

@mikeal
Copy link
Contributor

mikeal commented May 19, 2015

who in @nodejs/build can help us with the transition so that we can avoid downtime?

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented May 19, 2015

for a repo rename I just need to tell the server to start looking for events from org/reponame in /etc/github-webhook.json (and the github-webhook service needs to be restarted), @kenperkins has access to do that as well, @jbergstroem probably does too as does @indutny I think. Just ping one of us.

In terms of hosting the websites, we'll probably talk about that at our next convergence meeting nodejs/build#100

@indexzero
Copy link
Contributor

I am +1 on explicitly naming the git repository after the FQDN e.g.

iojs.org

@bnb
Copy link

bnb commented May 29, 2015

What will be the new website's repository's name?

@fhemberger
Copy link
Contributor

I'd favor iojs.org as well.

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

👍 iojs.org

@therebelrobot
Copy link
Contributor

+1 on iojs.org

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

@rvagg / @jbergstroem / @kenperkins could we do that today? Just let me know when you're ready and I'll rename this repo.

@jbergstroem
Copy link
Member

@Fishrock123 I'll be around but I haven't really messed around with the website stuff so I'd prefer if @rvagg is. If not, I'll figure it out.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jun 19, 2015

I'm here, make it so, this is just an update for /etc/github-webhook.json I think, perhaps also the build script it points to

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Done, awaiting build confirmation.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jun 19, 2015

good to go I think, let me know if the next push doesn't make it!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants