Which license is this released?

[ifraixedes]

I couldn't see the license of this repo; if you have released this work with one, can you make it more clear in the REAME or adding a LICENSE file?

Otherwise it would be good if you decide for one, whichever you want open source or not, and make it clearly visible.

[sg-modlab]

This is important. Don't want to report and engage with issues and/or try to fix them without a license. Open source? Beta before commercial? ...

[khalwat]

Well, I haven't decided. It's possible that when Craft 3 comes out, I will sell it in the Craft Store. Suggestions for a license to use with that possibility in mind?

I don't really consider it "beta" because I use it on production sites myself.

[sg-modlab]

I am not sure the right model to go from an open source license to commercial.

I guess this means that we will just report issues for you to fix in the meantime if we want to give this plugin a go.

Thanks for the quick reply and transparency.

[khalwat]

No problem. Still a chance it'll be OSS; I just want to leave the options open.

[ifraixedes]

I'm not an expert on this kind of mix and match licenses, but I guess that you can release it for non-commercial and if somebody want to use commercial then pay whatever you estimate.

[khalwat]

Just to clarify: the version for Craft 2.4 & 2.5 will always be free. But I do want to retain ownership/copyright on it in the event that I do decide to make it a paid plugin for Craft 3.

It'll need to be somewhat rewritten then anyway, and with the advent of the Craft Store, I think I'm not alone in this. I think we are at least a year off from that tho, probably more.

[khalwat]

I added the MIT license to my other github repos via LICENSE.txt files. Thanks for the heads up!

[khalwat]

I added a LICENSE.txt to the 1.0.5 release to clarify things.