You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 16, 2019. It is now read-only.
Zurb Foundation uses SCSS, so it makes sense that FoundationPress uses SCSS. Also, from what I have seen, SCSS syntax is much more widely used in comparison to Sass.
I haven't really thought about that and I think you're right about that scss is more common than sass.
Mostly I just import the necessary files into my sass files, but this method I can still use. It was just a thought.
I was talking about the directories where the scss files are stored in the assets folder. The method you use is called smacss. It's just a way to keep the sass files organized well, like Base, Layout, Modules etc.
Anyway, thanks for your clear answer and keep up the good work.
Cheers!
Op 8 jan. 2016 om 21:30 heeft Colin Marshall [email protected] het volgende geschreven:
Zurb Foundation uses SCSS, so it makes sense that FoundationPress uses SCSS. Also, for what I can tell, SCSS syntax is much more widely used in comparison to Sass.
What directory are you talking about?
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Hi there,
Not really an issue but more an idea/question.
Are there any plans to change over to sass instead of scss in the smacss-directory?
Thanks in advance!
Love the work!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: