-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check for offshore electricity emissions #44
Comments
The night time lights layer is causing 12.5% of stationary, transport and industrial emissions to be placed offshore. The discrepancy test fails for these layers if they are land masked. This seems very high so it should be investigated. |
I'm not sure about the details, but perhaps instead of masking we need to apply land area weighting? Alternatively the landmark could be expanded by x km to provide a buffer for offshore facilities |
is this with the national domain or NSW?
|
I think if masking puts 12.5% of nightlights offshore something has a problem
|
National domain |
This is less of a problem than it appears ... using percentage errors OCH4_AGRICULTURE 0.16581610706220368 0.16581610706220368 The fields which are showing impacts of landmasking are very small |
The problem
Decide if the
electricity
layer should be land-masked or not.From Peter's comment here: #43 (comment)
Definition of "done"
electricity
layer should be land-masked or not.Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: