[amenity-points] parking=disabled

[openstreetmap-trac]

Reporter: david[at]frankieandshadow.com
[Submitted to the original trac issue database at 6.01pm, Thursday, 27th October 2011]

Could I persuade you to add a wheelchair symbol to the P for parking symbol when you see
amenity=parking
with
parking=disabled
and/or
capacity:disabled=N for N > 0

[openstreetmap-trac]

Author: JulienBalas
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.20am, Thursday, 17th November 2011]

I second that.

The icon for "parking disabled" exist on the webpage which seems to be the source for mapnik icons
http://www.sjjb.co.uk/mapicons/contactsheet#transport

[openstreetmap-trac]

Author: Andrew Chadwick
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.15pm, Tuesday, 16th July 2013]

parking='' is for the type of parking structure, e.g. ''parking=surface'' or ''parking=multi-storey''. The right way to determine this in a map stylesheet is ''capacity:disabled=N* if N>0.

In the absence of this in the default Mapnik rendering, mappers are resorting to hacks like naming parking blocks for disabled drivers using name=Disabled. Hopefully a fix will emerge soon.

I'll report this over at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto for the stylesheet reimplementation effort too.

[openstreetmap-trac]

Author: Andrew Chadwick
[Added to the original trac issue at 12.21pm, Tuesday, 16th July 2013]

See gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#81

[openstreetmap-trac]

Author: math1985
[Added to the original trac issue at 9.38pm, Thursday, 12th June 2014]

Closed per Andrew Chadwick.

[openstreetmap-trac]

Author: Andrew Chadwick
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.03pm, Thursday, 12th June 2014]

Replying to [comment:5 math1985]:

Closed per Andrew Chadwick.

To clarify, I have nothing to do with this bug closure. I am still strongly in favour of some default layer on openstreetmap.org displaying an icon for disabled parking.

[openstreetmap-trac]

Author: math1985
[Added to the original trac issue at 10.44pm, Thursday, 12th June 2014]

Sorry for the unclear formulation - I of course meant that I closed it because you pointed out it is duplicate with the Github issue.