We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From Supported RFCs list as "not completed" for AIP 2.0 is RFC 0587 -- Support for the DIDComm V2 envelope format is a work in progress.
RFC 0587 -- Support for the DIDComm V2 envelope format is a work in progress
Please review RFC 0587 and the state of compliance for the RFC in ACA-Py to decide:
We need this information to make a call on whether or not to implement this before we release 1.0.0 of ACA-Py.
Asking @andrewwhitehead to look into this, but feel free to weigh in @TelegramSam @dbluhm @frostyfrog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since this is not relevant until we begin the transition to DIDComm v2, we are not going to implement this.
A PR to the Aries RFCs repo that is intended to remove RFC 0587 from AIP 2.0, meaning we don’t need to complete this to be “AIP 2.0” complete.
Closing this issue. A comparable issue will be re-opened sometime in the future when the transition to DIDComm v2 happens.
Sorry, something went wrong.
swcurran
No branches or pull requests
From Supported RFCs list as "not completed" for AIP 2.0 is
RFC 0587 -- Support for the DIDComm V2 envelope format is a work in progress
.Please review RFC 0587 and the state of compliance for the RFC in ACA-Py to decide:
We need this information to make a call on whether or not to implement this before we release 1.0.0 of ACA-Py.
Asking @andrewwhitehead to look into this, but feel free to weigh in @TelegramSam @dbluhm @frostyfrog
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: