Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Custom DHCP/BOOTP options for Kea DHCP #7550

Closed
2 tasks done
Codelica opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Feature: Custom DHCP/BOOTP options for Kea DHCP #7550

Codelica opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Codelica
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

In migrating from ISC DHCP to Kea DCHP one feature is still missing for me -- the ability to add custom DHCP/BOOTP options. (As defined here). For example I'm using option 43 (Vendor Specific Information) to assist in adoption of new Ubiquiti network equipment. Kea seems to have the ability documented here.

Describe the solution you like

The ability to add custom DHCP/BOOTP option similar to the current ISC DHCP interface.

Describe alternatives you considered

Giving up and staying with ISC DHCP until it no longer is offered. :)

Additional context

That's it, thanks for considering!

@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

same as #7361 (comment) ?

@Codelica
Copy link
Author

Wow, sorry I didn't think to search the PRs. That would definitely take care of my need, and looks more elaborate than the current ISC DHCP/BOOTP options implementation -- where you just add raw number, type, value combinations. I'll just follow that issue. Thanks!

@AdSchellevis
Copy link
Member

@Codelica no problem, on our end we just were not able to reach a functional state, we kept the code in a separate branch. When we know what the [kea] configuration should look like and there are people confirming it actually works, it shouldn't be a huge deal to finish the work.

@fichtner
Copy link
Member

There is Kea 1.6.0 in the pipeline, but I'm a bit reluctant to pull this in for 24.1.x. It might change things, but it might also bring new issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants