Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
Hi @Hedda, All the code we’re developing is fully “dockerized” and currently runs on the Nvidia Jetson’s ARM architecture, but it should be possible to port the logic to an x86-based (mini-ITX) solution. However, for mass manufacturing, ease of setup, and overall cost, the Jetson platform clearly wins so we've chosen to stay focused there for now. That said, if hardware, technologies, or costs shift in the future, you can count on us to adapt and scale the product in the right direction. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It was more the physical form-factor of a standard Mini-ITX board that I meant, and only since it is a standard so existing rack-enclosures exists: FYI, Nvidia have apparently previously made Mini-ITX reference carrier board for the older Jetson TX2 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If possible consider using standard Mini-ITX form factor for your upcoming AI Base Station to allow people to use standard computer chassis:
Mini-ITX form factor is usually best since there are so many existing compatible computer chassis/enclosures available for it, plus it is usually especially wanted for those who have some kind of 10-inch or 19-inch rack cabinets and want a rack-mounted computer chassi/enclosure (which are normally 1U in hight size).
See example:
Downside with standard Mini-ITX is normally requires Pico-PSU (picoPSU) adapter which in turn allow powing via external laptop power adapter.
Example are these type of Short Depth 2U 10-inch Mini-ITX case pictures below. There are many more examples of cases on this site:
PS: The alternatives are Flex-ATX (for which there are not a lot of chassis available) or Micro-ATX (which is much larger so size could be a hiderence for mounting in 10-inch racks and shipping will also be more expensive).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions