You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For some workflows, you may already have unmapped BAMs when you're ready to use splitcode and it would be helpful if you weren't required to convert them back to FASTQs.
As a specific example, PacBio HiFi data comes off instrument demultiplexed as unmapped BAMs. To do additional tag based extraction or demultiplexing with splitcode you currently need to convert to FASTQ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks -- I do think it'd be very useful as a feature (I mostly just hate writing the code to read/write BAM files which is why I haven't implemented it haha). Labeling this as an enhancement.
For some workflows, you may already have unmapped BAMs when you're ready to use splitcode and it would be helpful if you weren't required to convert them back to FASTQs.
As a specific example, PacBio HiFi data comes off instrument demultiplexed as unmapped BAMs. To do additional tag based extraction or demultiplexing with splitcode you currently need to convert to FASTQ.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: