-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
CIL/Rhodium data requests #5
Comments
Sounds great! Our ideal timeline would be to have this completed within the month. However, I completely understand the limitations given you two may be spread thin between projects. Therefore, we do have a few workaround options if you feel that this timeline might be too ambitious. |
Thanks for this timeline information, @rfofrich. @jbusecke and I are working on this repo this week. Once we have a bit more headway (perhaps late next week), I can circle back to this thread with a better estimate on timing for these datasets. If we don't hit too many snags, it's conceivable we could make this work within your stated timeline. |
@cisaacstern Thank you for the update. Our timeline is somewhat flexible. Therefore, no pressure if it takes slightly longer than expected and I'm looking forward to seeing this further developed. Thank you and @jbusecke again for working on this, it's extremely helpful. |
Just checking in on this. I think we have made some good progress on the feedstock, but your request might pose some unique challenges since it is daily (compared to the request in #3). |
@jbusecke Thank you for the update and for working on this. Do you have access to the datasets you need to continue? |
I would get them directly from ESGF if everything works according to plan. So I should be good on that side. Ill keep you posted on the progress. |
Apologies for the long wait here, but we have made significant progress on ingesting new stores via apache-beam at a larger scale recently. |
Here's the list of requested instance ids from @rfofrich, initially provided in pangeo-data/pangeo-cmip6-cloud#38 (comment):
We'll start working on these as soon as the prototyped submission framework looks workable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: