We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently the MemoryOverlayStateProvider expects the list of blocks to be [old -> new]
[old -> new]
reth/crates/chain-state/src/memory_overlay.rs
Lines 13 to 14 in c4bf5bb
Line 34 in c4bf5bb
but this is usually populated by walking backwards:
reth/crates/engine/tree/src/tree.rs
Lines 732 to 735 in c4bf5bb
so it would be more efficient if we'd do [new -> old] so appending a parent block is a simple push
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
fgimenez
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Currently the MemoryOverlayStateProvider expects the list of blocks to be
[old -> new]
reth/crates/chain-state/src/memory_overlay.rs
Lines 13 to 14 in c4bf5bb
reth/crates/chain-state/src/memory_overlay.rs
Line 34 in c4bf5bb
but this is usually populated by walking backwards:
reth/crates/engine/tree/src/tree.rs
Lines 732 to 735 in c4bf5bb
so it would be more efficient if we'd do [new -> old] so appending a parent block is a simple push
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: