This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 6, 2020. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Disable preparing work package if miners don't ask for it. #771
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tomusdrw
added
A0-pleasereview 🤓
Pull request needs code review.
A3-inprogress ⏳
Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage.
and removed
A0-pleasereview 🤓
Pull request needs code review.
labels
Mar 18, 2016
Conflicts: ethcore/src/client/test_client.rs miner/src/miner.rs
tomusdrw
added
A0-pleasereview 🤓
Pull request needs code review.
and removed
A3-inprogress ⏳
Pull request is in progress. No review needed at this stage.
labels
Mar 18, 2016
needs resolving. |
also, would be good to include a bit of text here to describe the changes (in particular what state is added). |
Conflicts: miner/src/miner.rs
let current_no = chain.chain_info().best_block_number; | ||
let last_request = self.sealing_block_last_request.lock().unwrap(); | ||
|
||
current_no - *last_request > SEALING_TIMEOUT_IN_BLOCKS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
current_no
can theoretically go down over time (e.g. a shorter fork with higher total difficulty)
gavofyork
added
A8-looksgood 🦄
Pull request is reviewed well.
A5-grumble 🔥
Pull request has minor issues that must be addressed before merging.
and removed
A0-pleasereview 🤓
Pull request needs code review.
A8-looksgood 🦄
Pull request is reviewed well.
labels
Mar 19, 2016
looks good otherwise. |
tomusdrw
added
A0-pleasereview 🤓
Pull request needs code review.
and removed
A5-grumble 🔥
Pull request has minor issues that must be addressed before merging.
labels
Mar 20, 2016
gavofyork
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2016
Disable preparing work package if miners don't ask for it.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently we start preparing new block for sealing (after chain head changes) only if miner will ask for work package (i.e.
sealing_block
method is called). After that we will be preparing new blocks indefinitely even though no one is expecting us to do so.This PR introduces "block timeout". After
SEALING_TIMEOUT_IN_BLOCKS
(constant) blocks without being asked forsealing_block
we stop producing new blocks (sealing_enabled
is flipped)