Refactor pdm.cli.actions

[danieleades]

address a handful of type errors in pdm.cli.actions

this is stacked on #427

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #428 (a14765c) into master (229e455) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 95.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #428      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   83.48%   83.43%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          68       68              
  Lines        5309     5311       +2     
  Branches      944      945       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         4432     4431       -1     
- Misses        602      609       +7     
+ Partials      275      271       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	83.35% <95.00%> (-0.06%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pdm/cli/actions.py	73.86% <91.66%> (-0.19%)	⬇️
pdm/cli/utils.py	81.88% <100.00%> (+0.66%)	⬆️
pdm/models/setup.py	54.15% <0.00%> (-1.59%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 229e455...a14765c. Read the comment docs.

[frostming]

LGTM, is the type error of pdm.cli.actions clear?

[danieleades]

LGTM, is the type error of pdm.cli.actions clear?

no, this pull request doesn't fully eliminate type errors from this file, just reduces the number