You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From the discussion in pelias/pelias#167 we've found a case where records that don't have a locality lead to poor labels. For example, an address just outside the city limits of Davis, California has the label 110A Sage Street, CA, USA, which is not so good.
In this case, we want to fall back and use the county, so the label would be 110A Sage Street, Yolo County, CA, USA. Of course, we don't want to add the county to the label in general, since that's generally redundant and not particularly interesting to most people.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From the discussion in pelias/pelias#167 we've found a case where records that don't have a locality lead to poor labels. For example, an address just outside the city limits of Davis, California has the label
110A Sage Street, CA, USA
, which is not so good.In this case, we want to fall back and use the county, so the label would be
110A Sage Street, Yolo County, CA, USA
. Of course, we don't want to add the county to the label in general, since that's generally redundant and not particularly interesting to most people.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: