Run before/after for static files

[chufengma]

No description provided.

[MouettE-SC]

I don't have a use case for that but if anyone has please share ! (related to #591 )

[TuxGamer]

I am compiling LESS files to CSS. It worked well in Spark 2.2 (and I think 2.3 too), but no longer in 2.5.
Also Stylesheets (.css files) are sent with Content-Type header of "text/html" which is wrong.

EDIT: Confirmed, less caching and compiling works fine with Spark 2.3. I'll stick with that version then

[tipsy]

I am compiling LESS files to CSS. It worked well in Spark 2.2 (and I think 2.3 too), but no longer in 2.5.

Why would Spark have anything to do with LESS? When Spark tries to access them they're just normal CSS files?

Also Stylesheets (.css files) are sent with Content-Type header of "text/html" which is wrong.

This has been fixed on master.

[TuxGamer]

Thank you very much :)

Spark itself has nothing to do with LESS, but I have been using a before filter to recompile them using https://github.com/i-net-software/jlessc if necessary

[tipsy]

Spark itself has nothing to do with LESS, but I have been using a before filter to recompile them using https://github.com/i-net-software/jlessc if necessary

Never thought about doing that, interesting approach!

[N0odlez]

@tipsy Personally I don't see this as an issue with Spark. This isn't the intended way of Spark nor is it best practice for compiling LESS to css. (Although a very imaginative way to do so hat's of to you @TuxGamer ).

[tipsy]

@tipsy Personally I don't see this as an issue with Spark

I agree, I'm just keeping the issue open in case anyone comes up with an actual use-case for before/after filters for static routes.

[martin-pabst]

We have static files (Documents) which should only be downloaded by persons with proper authorization (stored in session). A before filter for the static file route would be useful for us.

[itaied246]

Any work in progress for this issue?

[aartiPl]

Static web pages should be also displayed after security verification. We are using Google Polymer for frontend (http://polymer-project.org/) which at the end generates only static web pages. All GUI magic is done in HTML / Javascript. In such a model there is no way to implement security on user interface - only pulling data from server and actions implemented on server can be secured.
In our case we will have to resolve to dirty workarounds to secure displaying some of the web pages.

[Heptalon]

Is there any workaround to do access restrictions for static files or is there a chance that before-filters will affect static files in the future?

[WayneDoherty]

Use Case:
Vary cache control for static files.
Static files with cache busting filenames can be served with very aggressive cache control headers,
whilst other static assets could be served with more moderate cache control.
For example:
A static terms of service page "toc.html" could be served out of the static assets with a cache expiry of 1 hour, but "8924398243934.js" could be set to expire after 1 year

[andrea-bologna]

Any update on this? I have index.html and want to protect it with a form authentication based on pac4j but cannot apply the security filter on it.

[martin-pabst]

This issue led me to change my approach: I now use jetty webserver in embedded mode without spark framework. It's a bit more complicated but gives me a very high degree of flexibility.

[TuxGamer]

Can you please give an example? I'm interested too :)

[martin-pabst]

I wrote a brief description with code snippets:

http://www.pabst-software.de/doku.php?id=programmieren:java:webserver:jetty:start

Hope this is helpful to you.

BTW: If you look at this vast amount of initialization code you clearly see the benefits of the spark framework. I certyainly will continue using it in my smaller projects.

[SeanSWatkins]

Please correct me if I am off point.

My current use case would be redirecting users from HTTP to HTTPS in order to facilitate HSTS for my static files.
A bit of background, I am using Spark in a Google App Engine Project and currently there doesn't seem to be a way to force users to go to HTTPS for static files, while all other API's are fine.

I have been searching for a way around this for a couple weeks now and I am unable to find anything that would work.

[StefanLiebig]

My use case for this is also authentication/authorization in before filters. Unfortunately I filled a similar issue here: perwendel/spark-kotlin#23

(using spark 2.6.0)

[TuxGamer]

If you are comfortable forking and patching Spark yourself, look up the class MatcherFilter here: https://github.com/perwendel/spark/blob/2.6.0/src/main/java/spark/http/matching/MatcherFilter.java

More precisely lines 94 and 129. Haven't tested this yet, though.

Also Spark 2.2 runs filters on static files. I think there are no known vulnerabilities in 2.2, but I don't recommend using outdated software

[StefanLiebig]

Ok, I came up with this (attached), based on 2.6.0. But it needs further testing and reviewing.
MatcherFilter.zip

[TuxGamer]

Just confirmed - it works fine, even in version 2.5.2. Placing the source file in my own project was sufficient.

Thank you very much :)

[StefanLiebig]

I would be happy if Per could have a look at it.

[DejfCold]

@perwendel Hi, I just wanted to point out that this issue is still opened and the change @StefanHUB did wasn't implemented as of version 2.8.0.
Is there a reason for that? I mean, sure, there was no pull request afaik, but ...

[metaphyze]

I'd like to add my voice to promoting this issue. This would be an incredibly useful feature.