-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Copy pathpairs.yaml
4972 lines (4972 loc) · 157 KB
/
pairs.yaml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
abc_headlines:
- generation: the year they were published
applications:
- target: which categories of news dominated the headlines from year to year
user: a historian writing about trends
example_hypotheses:
- talks about healthcare and medical breakthroughs or issues
- mention sporting events, such as AFL games and the Rugby World Cup
- focus on issues related to agriculture, such as the rise of female farmers and
push for higher milk prices
v2-origid: 3
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: time
pairs:
'2007_2008':
pos_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2007
neg_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2008
pos_class:
- '2007'
neg_class:
- '2008'
example_hypotheses:
- talks less about the economy
- talks less about the election
- mentions President Bush
- discusses terrorism
'2010_2014':
pos_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2010
neg_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2014
pos_class:
- '2010'
neg_class:
- '2014'
example_hypotheses:
- mentions Obamacare
- talks about the recession
'2016_2017':
pos_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2017
neg_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2016
pos_class:
- '2017'
neg_class:
- '2016'
example_hypotheses:
- mentions Clinton
- mentions polling
- refers to Trump as a candidate
- talks about Russia
'2019_2020':
pos_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2019
neg_desc: are ABC news headlines from 2020
pos_class:
- '2019'
neg_class:
- '2020'
example_hypotheses:
- talks less about COVID-19
- is more optimistic
- mentions President Trump
- does not mention Biden
flip: true
ad_transcripts:
- generation: the industry of the company
applications:
- target: what different industries appeal to in ads
user: an advertiser trying to learn about other industries
example_hypotheses:
- emphasizes the results of the product, such as long-lasting colour or healthier-looking
skin
- uses adjectives such as 'rich', 'sultry', and 'gorgeous' to describe the product
- mentions natural ingredients and botanicals
v2-origid: 5
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: subject
pairs:
automative_travel:
pos_desc: are ad transcripts for automobile companies
neg_desc: are ad transcripts for travel companies
pos_class:
- Automotive
neg_class:
- Travel
example_hypotheses:
- talks more about cars
- talks more about fuel efficiency
- discusses speed
- appeals to men
beauty_care:
pos_desc: are ad transcripts for beauty products
neg_desc: are ad transcripts for personal care products
pos_class:
- Beauty
neg_class:
- Home & Personal Care
example_hypotheses:
- talks more about perception
- talks more about fashion
- appeals to women
- mentions beauty brands
flip: true
admin_statements:
- generation: the president leading the administration
applications:
- target: the legislative priorities of each administration
user: a political scientist analyzing policy stances
example_hypotheses:
- mentions the Affordable Care Act
- mentions the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
- acknowledges the importance of the African Growth and Opportunity Act
v2-origid: 6
purely_exploratory: false
- target: the ideological stances of each administration
user: a political scientist analyzing policy stances
example_hypotheses:
- discusses the importance of collaboration with States, Tribes, local governments,
and private entities
- highlights the need for investments in defense readiness and modernization
- discusses the need for environmental justice
v2-origid: 2006
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: authorship
pairs:
obama_biden:
pos_desc: are administration statements from Obama
neg_desc: are administration statements from Biden
pos_class:
- 44-Obama
neg_class:
- 46-Biden
example_hypotheses:
- talks more about the Great Recession
- does not mention COVID-19
- mentions healthcare
- discusses troops
- mentions unemployment
trump_biden:
pos_desc: are administration statements from Trump
neg_desc: are administration statements from Biden
pos_class:
- 45-Trump
neg_class:
- 46-Biden
example_hypotheses:
- talks more about immigration
- favors conservative policies
- talks less about COVID-19
- is more hostile
flip: true
airline_reviews:
- generation: the stars given in the review
applications:
- target: how to improve specific aspects of the airport and airplane experience
for customers
user: the manager of an airport
example_hypotheses:
- mentions the lack of a complimentary item (e.g. a muffin)
- mentions the seat pitch being too small for a tall person
- mentions the lack of USB and power outlets at the seat
v2-origid: 12
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: sentiment
pairs:
airline_comfort_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline's comfort 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airline's comfort 5/5
pos_class:
- airline_overall_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_overall_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- talks about seat space
- mentions uncomfortable seats
- talks about the poor service
airline_entertainment_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline's entertainment 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airline's entertainment 5/5
pos_class:
- airline_entertainment_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_entertainment_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- complains about lack of wifi
- mentions lack of selection of movies
- talks about children being bored
airline_food_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline's food 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airline's food 5/5
pos_class:
- airline_food_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_food_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- talks about terrible tasting food
- mentions food poisoning
airline_overall_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline overall 1/10
neg_desc: rate an airline overall 5/10
pos_class:
- airline_overall_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_overall_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- is very frustrated
- uses profanity
- mentions a failure to receive a refund
- mentions a canceled flight
airline_overall_5_8:
pos_desc: rate an airline overall 8/10
neg_desc: rate an airline overall 10/10
pos_class:
- airline_overall_rating_8
neg_class:
- airline_overall_rating_10
example_hypotheses:
- mentions minor inconveniences
- talks about discomfort during the flight
- is neutral in tone
airline_service_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline's service 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airline's service 5/5
pos_class:
- airline_service_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_service_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- complains about untimely services
- mentions lack of food
airline_staff_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline's staff 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airline's staff 5/5
pos_class:
- airline_staff_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_staff_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- talks about rude staff
- mentions understaffing
airline_value_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airline's value 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airline's value 5/5
pos_class:
- airline_value_rating_1
neg_class:
- airline_value_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- talks about expensive pricing
- mentions unexpected charges
airport_cleanliness_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airport's cleanliness 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airport's cleanliness 5/5
pos_class:
- airport_cleanliness_rating_1
neg_class:
- airport_cleanliness_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- mentions dirt on the floor
- mentions food left on the seat
airport_overall_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airport 1/10 overall
neg_desc: rate an airport 5/10 overall
pos_class:
- airport_overall_rating_1
neg_class:
- airport_overall_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- is very frustrated
- mentions a terrible experience
airport_overall_5_8:
pos_desc: rate an airport 8/10 overall
neg_desc: rate an airport 10/10 overall
pos_class:
- airport_overall_rating_8
neg_class:
- airport_overall_rating_10
example_hypotheses:
- mentions minor inconveniences
- talks about the service or entertainment
airport_queue_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airport's queue 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airport's queue 5/5
pos_class:
- airport_queue_rating_1
neg_class:
- airport_queue_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- talks about long waits
- complains about TSA
- mentions missing a flight
airport_shopping_rating_1_5:
pos_desc: rate an airport's shopping avenues 1/5
neg_desc: rate an airport's shopping avenues 5/5
pos_class:
- airport_shopping_rating_1
neg_class:
- airport_shopping_rating_5
example_hypotheses:
- talks about a lack of food
- complains about pricing
- mentions essential goods
flip: false
- generation: the airline the reviewer flew
applications:
- target: which aspects of each airline stand out to customers
user: a consumer researcher at an airline company
example_hypotheses:
- expresses frustration with the airline's refusal to offer any restitution for
lost hotel reservations
- mentions the staff as being unhelpful or rude
- mentions difficulty with checking in or printing boarding passes
v2-origid: 29
purely_exploratory: false
- target: what services and products are only offered by the other airline
user: the CEO of an airline company
example_hypotheses:
- notes the Indian veg/non-veg meal on board
- mentions wifi is not available in DXB
- mentions the lack of a tablet for controlling the entertainment system
v2-origid: 28
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: subject
pairs:
american_delta:
pos_desc: review American Airlines flights
neg_desc: review Delta Airlines flights
pos_class:
- airline_american
neg_class:
- airline_delta
example_hypotheses:
- talks about higher prices
british_ryan:
pos_desc: review of British Airways flights
neg_desc: review of Ryan Air flights
pos_class:
- airline_british
neg_class:
- airline_ryan
example_hypotheses:
- praises service
- complains about cost
canada:
pos_desc: review Canada Airlines flights
neg_desc: review Canada Airlines Rogue flights
pos_class:
- airline_canada
neg_class:
- airline_canada_rogue
example_hypotheses:
- does not mention business class
- talks about worse service
jet_emirates:
pos_desc: review Jet Airways flights
neg_desc: review Emirates flights
pos_class:
- airline_jet
neg_class:
- airline_emirates
example_hypotheses:
- mentions Dubai
- talks about food options
spirit_frontier:
pos_desc: review Spirit flights
neg_desc: review Frontier flights
pos_class:
- airline_spirit
neg_class:
- airline_frontier
example_hypotheses:
- complains about delayed flights
- mentions pricing
united_american:
pos_desc: review United Airlines flights
neg_desc: review American Airlines flights
pos_class:
- airline_united
neg_class:
- airline_american
example_hypotheses:
- talks about destinations outside of the US
- mentions long flights
- talks about food
flip: true
- generation: the country the reviewer is from
applications:
- target: which specific features reviewers from each country care about
user: an owner of an international airline
example_hypotheses:
- mentions the quality of the onboard food
- mentions the price of the ticket
- mentions the IFE and its various offerings
v2-origid: 36
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: demographic
pairs:
author_sg_in:
pos_desc: are airline reviews from Singapore
neg_desc: are airline reviews from India
pos_class:
- author_sg
neg_class:
- author_in
example_hypotheses:
- talks about service
- mentions communication issues
- mentions Asian food
author_uk_us:
pos_desc: are airline reviews from the UK
neg_desc: are airline reviews from the US
pos_class:
- author_uk
neg_class:
- author_us
example_hypotheses:
- uses a condescending tone
- is rude
author_aus_cad:
pos_desc: are airline reviews from Australia
neg_desc: are airline reviews from Canada
pos_class:
- author_aus
neg_class:
- author_cad
example_hypotheses:
- is more critical
- uses less polite language
author_ger_fr:
pos_desc: are airline reviews from Germany
neg_desc: are airline reviews from France
pos_class:
- author_ger
neg_class:
- author_fr
example_hypotheses:
- is more critical
flip: true
- generation: the type of seat on the reviewed plane
applications:
- target: what customers like and don't like about each type of seat
user: a designer of airport seats
example_hypotheses:
- mentions difficulty getting out of the seat if the passenger in front reclines
- comments on the lack of PTV or AVOD
- describes the lack of space for cabin bags underneath the seat
v2-origid: 38
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: subject
pairs:
seats_3x3x3_3x3:
pos_desc: review airplane seats in a 3x3x3 arrangement
neg_desc: review airplane seats in a 3x3 arrangement
pos_class:
- seats_3x3x3
neg_class:
- seats_3x3
example_hypotheses:
- complains about room
- mentions difficulty reaching bathrooms
seats_3x4x3_2x4x2:
pos_desc: review airplane seats in a 3x4x3 arrangement
neg_desc: review airplane seats in a 2x4x2 arrangement
pos_class:
- seats_3x4x3
neg_class:
- seats_2x4x2
example_hypotheses:
- complains about being in the middle seat
- talks about poor seatmates
flip: true
- generation: the model of the plane the reviewer flew on
applications:
- target: what customers like and don't like about each plane model
user: a product manager at an airplane manufacturer
example_hypotheses:
- mentions how the reclined seat in front makes it difficult to access the tray
table
- mentions how the entertainment screen is too close to the face to be visible
- mentions how the entertainment system is excellent and includes USB charger
ports
v2-origid: 40
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: subject
pairs:
seats_a340_a330:
pos_desc: review seats on the Airbus 340
neg_desc: review seats on the Airbus 330
pos_class:
- seats_a340
neg_class:
- seats_a330
example_hypotheses:
- mentions wider seats
- more positive
- praises the entertainment
seats_a380_a340:
pos_desc: review seats on the Airbus 380
neg_desc: review seats on the Airbus 340
pos_class:
- seats_a380
neg_class:
- seats_a340
example_hypotheses:
- mentions wider seats
- more positive
- praises the entertainment
seats_b777_b747:
pos_desc: review seats on the Boeing 777
neg_desc: review seats on the Boeing 747
pos_class:
- seats_b777
neg_class:
- seats_b747
example_hypotheses:
- mentions wider seats
- more positive
- praises the entertainment
flip: true
- generation: the cabin of the customer
applications:
- target: the specific needs of customers in each cabin
user: a product manager at an airline company
example_hypotheses:
- describes the difficulty of getting out of a row in-flight
- mentions the need to haggle for dinner vouchers
- mentions the lack of priority boarding and/or lounge access
v2-origid: 42
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: demographic
pairs:
seats_econ_prem:
pos_desc: review airplane seats for economy passengers
neg_desc: review airplane seats for premium passengers
pos_class:
- seats_econ
neg_class:
- seats_prem
example_hypotheses:
- complains about room
- talks about poor service
flip: true
- generation: the type of traveller
applications:
- target: the specific needs of different kinds of travellers
user: a product manager at an airline company
example_hypotheses:
- mentions the high prices for food and drinks
- complains about a lack of seating and a lack of wheelchair accommodations
- mentions feeling rushed or not having enough time to make a connecting flight
v2-origid: 43
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: demographic
pairs:
traveller_family_business:
pos_desc: are airline ratings from family travellers
neg_desc: are airline ratings from business travellers
pos_class:
- traveller_family
neg_class:
- traveller_business
example_hypotheses:
- mentions food
- mentions bathrooms
- does not mention delays
traveller_solo_couple:
pos_desc: are airline ratings from solo travellers
neg_desc: are airline ratings from couple travellers
pos_class:
- traveller_solo
neg_class:
- traveller_couple
example_hypotheses:
- focuses on practical needs
- talks
flip: true
aita:
- generation: whether Reddit commenters said they were in the wrong
applications:
- target: the speaking style of people in the wrong
user: a sociologist studying moral judgements
example_hypotheses:
- employs guilt-tripping language, such as 'sacrifice' and 'heartbroken'
- uses language to diminish the other person's opinion, such as 'completely unreasonable'
or 'ridiculous'
- uses generalizations or stereotypes about people
v2-origid: 61
purely_exploratory: false
- target: the actions which were judged as right or wrong
user: a sociologist studying moral judgements
example_hypotheses:
- demonstrates an effort to compromise or come to a mutual understanding
- acknowledges their own mistakes and takes responsibility for their actions
- demonstrates an understanding that there may be multiple perspectives on a given
situation
v2-origid: 50
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: judgement
pairs:
verdict_a_nta:
pos_desc: describe scenarios where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios where the author is not in the wrong
pos_class:
- verdict_a
neg_class:
- verdict_nta
example_hypotheses:
- is condescending in tone
- doesn't express regret
- is too confident
- mentions making assumptions about other people
verdict_es_a:
pos_desc: describe scenarios where everyone is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios where the author is in the wrong
pos_class:
- verdict_es
neg_class:
- verdict_a
example_hypotheses:
- describes multiple difficult people
- talks about fighting
- is condescending
verdict_nah_nta:
pos_desc: describe scenarios where no one is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios where the other person is in the wrong
pos_class:
- verdict_nah
neg_class:
- verdict_nta
example_hypotheses:
- talks about a dilemma
- expresses humility
topic_work:
pos_desc: describe work-related scenarios where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe work-related scenarios where the author is not in the wrong
pos_class:
- topic_work_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_work_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes failure to communicate
- talks about a mean boss
- mentions deadlines
topic_sex:
pos_desc: describe intercourse-related scenarios where the author is in the
wrong
neg_desc: describe intercourse-related scenarios where the author is not in
the wrong
pos_class:
- topic_sex_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_sex_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes deception
- mentions consent
- is written by a man
topic_ex:
pos_desc: describe scenarios involving a former partner where the author is
in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios involving a former partner where the author is
in the wrong
pos_class:
- topic_ex_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_ex_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes resentment
- talks about revenge
topic_race:
pos_desc: describe scenarios involving racism where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios involving racism where the author is not in the
wrong
pos_class:
- topic_race_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_race_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- implies a shallow understanding of racism
- talks about a joke
- is written by someone who is white
topic_husband:
pos_desc: describe scenarios about the author's husband where the author is
in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios about the author's husband where the author is
not in the wrong
pos_class:
- topic_husband_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_husband_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes failure to communicate
- talks about misreading emotions
topic_wife:
pos_desc: describe scenarios about the author's wife where the author is in
the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios about the author's wife where the author is not
in the wrong
pos_class:
- topic_husband_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_husband_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes failure to communicate
- mentions lack of support
topic_sexuality:
pos_desc: describe scenarios about sexuality where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios about sexuality where the author is not in the
wrong
pos_class:
- topic_sexuality_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_sexuality_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes failure to communicate
- suggests homophobia
topic_children:
pos_desc: describe scenarios about children where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios about children where the author is not in the wrong
pos_class:
- topic_children_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_children_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- implies hatred of children
- mentions irresponsible actions
topic_social_media:
pos_desc: describe scenarios about social media where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios about social media where the author is not in the
wrong
pos_class:
- topic_social_media_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_social_media_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- talks about a violation of trust
topic_alcohol:
pos_desc: describe scenarios involving alcohol where the author is in the wrong
neg_desc: describe scenarios involving alcohol where the author is not in the
wrong
pos_class:
- topic_alcohol_is_asshole
neg_class:
- topic_alcohol_not_asshole
example_hypotheses:
- describes failure to communicate
flip: true
armenian_jobs:
- generation: the year the application was posted
applications:
- target: how the application requirements have evolved over time
user: a journalist writing about the job market
example_hypotheses:
- asks for a cover letter
- mentions the need for a letter of recommendation
- requires citizenship
v2-origid: 72
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: time
pairs:
apps_pre_post_2012:
pos_desc: are job applications requirements from 2010 to 2012
neg_desc: are job applications requirements from 2013 to 2014
pos_class:
- app_process_years_2010_2013
neg_class:
- app_process_years_2013_2015
example_hypotheses:
- talks more about online applications
- mentions in person interview
pre_post_recession:
pos_desc: are job postings from 2004 to 2006
neg_desc: are job postings from 2007 to 2009
pos_class:
- job_req_years_2004_2007
neg_class:
- job_req_years_2007_2010
example_hypotheses:
- requires more experience
- lists specific languages
- requires a Master's degree
reqs_pre_post_2012:
pos_desc: are job postings from 2010 to 2012
neg_desc: are job postings from 2013 to 2014
pos_class:
- job_req_years_2010_2013
neg_class:
- job_req_years_2013_2015
example_hypotheses:
- requires newer programming languages
- requires more education
flip: true
- generation: the type of role offered
applications:
- target: the expectations and responsibilities of each role, such as specific skills
or experiences
user: a job seeker figuring out which role is right for me
example_hypotheses:
- emphasizes the importance of company values and ethics
- requires familiarity with test automation processes
- Requires travelling for extended periods of time
v2-origid: 74
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: subject
pairs:
junior_senior:
pos_desc: are job postings for junior positions
neg_desc: are job postings for senior positions
pos_class:
- job_req_senior_sw_dev
- job_req_senior_sw_eng
- job_req_senior_qa_eng
neg_class:
- job_req_qa_eng
- job_req_sw_eng
- job_req_sw_dev
example_hypotheses:
- talks about senior positions
- mentions leadership experience
sw_qa:
pos_desc: are job postings for software positions
neg_desc: are job postings for quality assurance positions
pos_class:
- job_desc_sw_dev
- job_desc_senior_sw_dev
- job_desc_sw_eng
- job_desc_senior_sw_eng
neg_class:
- job_desc_qa_eng
- job_desc_senior_qa_eng
example_hypotheses:
- talks less about testing
- talks more about development
- mentions Java
flip: true
blm_countermovements:
- generation: the hashtags included in the Tweet
applications:
- target: the arguments made by each movement
user: a sociologist studying cultural movements
example_hypotheses:
- includes criticism of media coverage and representation
- mentions the success of peaceful protests
- emphasizes freedom of speech for protesters
- mentions the safety benefits of police officers
v2-origid: 76
purely_exploratory: false
- target: the attitude of each movement
user: a sociologist studying cultural movements
example_hypotheses:
- mentions the importance of respecting all life
- uses language advocating for unity and solidarity
- uses language of acceptance, understanding, and respect
- expresses a desire for change and reform in the justice system
- contains language that promotes empathy towards other races
- uses language that acknowledges racism
v2-origid: 2076
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: subject
pairs:
all_white:
pos_desc: 'are Tweets containing #AllLivesMatter'
neg_desc: 'are Tweets in support #WhiteLivesMatter'
pos_class:
- all_lives_matter
neg_class:
- white_lives_matter
example_hypotheses:
- does not demean black people
- does not mention white people
- is moderate in tone
blue_white:
pos_desc: 'are Tweets in support of #BlueLivesMatter'
neg_desc: 'are Tweets in support of #WhiteLivesMatter'
pos_class:
- blue_lives_matter
neg_class:
- white_lives_matter
example_hypotheses:
- mentions support for police
- does not demean black people
- mentions crime
blue_all:
pos_desc: 'are Tweets in support of #BlueLivesMatter'
neg_desc: 'are Tweets in support of #AllLivesMatter'
pos_class:
- blue_lives_matter
neg_class:
- all_lives_matter
example_hypotheses:
- mentions support for police
- talks about crime
- is not outwardly racist
flip: true
cah:
- generation: how many times the card won
applications:
- target: which topics tend to be funnier
user: a rhetoric researcher studying humor
example_hypotheses:
- is about intercourse
- mentions death and violence
- brings up romantic relationships
purely_exploratory: false
- target: what kinds of punchlines are funny
user: a rhetoric researcher studying humor
example_hypotheses:
- are highly related to the setup
- are short
- include a play on words
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: judgement
pairs:
white_cards:
pos_desc: are white cards that won the most
neg_desc: are white cards that won the least
pos_class:
- cards_funny
neg_class:
- cards_not_funny
jokes_funny_somewhat_funny:
pos_desc: are black card-white card pairs that won very often
neg_desc: are black card-white card pairs that won somewhat often
pos_class:
- jokes_very_funny
neg_class:
- jokes_somewhat_funny
jokes_funny_unfunny:
pos_desc: are black card-white card pairs that won often
neg_desc: are black card-white card pairs that usually lost
pos_class:
- jokes_very_funny
- jokes_funny
neg_class:
- jokes_not_funny
flip: true
clickbait_headlines:
- generation: the year it was published
applications:
- target: which specific topics dominate the news from year to year
user: a researcher studying misinformation
example_hypotheses:
- mentions gun control or gun related issues
- mentions the death of a celebrity
- mentions natural disasters and weather events
v2-origid: 79
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: time
pairs:
pre_post_2013:
pos_desc: are clickbait headlines from 2010 to 2012
neg_desc: are clickbait headlines from 2013 to 2015
pos_class:
- '2010'
- '2011'
- '2012'
neg_class:
- '2013'
- '2014'
- '2015'
example_hypotheses:
- talks more about Mitt Romney
- talks more about Obama
flip: true
convincing_arguments:
- generation: how convincing annotators judged the arguments
applications:
- target: the rhetorical devices used by convincing arguments
user: a student writing an argumentative essay who hopes to improve their writing
example_hypotheses:
- uses personal stories and anecdotes to bring the argument to life
- uses vivid language to paint a picture of the situation
- acknowledges other perspectives, but provides reasons for why their own is more
valid
v2-origid: 80
purely_exploratory: false
pair_type: judgement
pairs:
convincing_unconvincing:
pos_desc: are convincing arguments
neg_desc: are unconvincing arguments
pos_class:
- somewhat_convincing
- convincing
neg_class:
- unconvincing
example_hypotheses:
- provides more explanation
- gives examples
- does not insult others
- cites evidence
convincing_somewhat_convincing:
pos_desc: are very convincing arguments
neg_desc: are somewhat convincing arguments
pos_class:
- convincing
neg_class:
- somewhat_convincing
example_hypotheses:
- provides a clear explanation
- links a sources
- is confident
flip: true
craigslist_negotiations: