-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 850
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[update] add client.Reader in Reconciler #892
Conversation
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this looks perfect! Thanks for the quick fix.
Another thing is that can you please add some E2E tests to ensure this working as expected with fieldSelector?
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
@yeya24 I have dealt with the other comments, but the e2e test seems inconvenient to add. I tested it manually before. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
rest LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Passing an argument to every function is really annoying (:crying_cat_face: I need |
/merge |
/run-all-tests |
@fewdan merge failed. |
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
/merge |
/run-all-tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/merge |
/run-all-tests |
* update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * fix vet Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * fix go vet Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * address comments Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * address comment Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
cherry pick to release-1.0 failed |
* update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * fix vet Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * fix go vet Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * address comments Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * update Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]> * address comment Signed-off-by: “fewdan” <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: “fewdan” [email protected]
What problem does this PR solve?
solve #878
What is changed and how does it work?
add client.Reader in Reconciler
Checklist
Tests
Side effects
Related changes
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?