You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I love your new"ish" .str.extract_many.
However, I would have assumed that a find_many (that returns the first start position of each of the matches) was actually the much more useful and more general method.
I barely ever had use case where I would need my (string literal!) patterns returned but had many use cases where I wanted to know the positions of those matches.
In any case, I am not saying that extract_many should go but would love to see a find_many equivalent.
It actually sounds relatively easy and I might consider it as a first Rust project that I could look at with some help. If you consider it a worthy addition.
I have not found a similar issue/request so far.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
I love your new"ish" .str.extract_many.
However, I would have assumed that a find_many (that returns the first start position of each of the matches) was actually the much more useful and more general method.
I barely ever had use case where I would need my (string literal!) patterns returned but had many use cases where I wanted to know the positions of those matches.
In any case, I am not saying that extract_many should go but would love to see a find_many equivalent.
It actually sounds relatively easy and I might consider it as a first Rust project that I could look at with some help. If you consider it a worthy addition.
I have not found a similar issue/request so far.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: