Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

name check is tricky #25

Closed
runcom opened this issue Sep 13, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

name check is tricky #25

runcom opened this issue Sep 13, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@runcom
Copy link

runcom commented Sep 13, 2016

see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375661

is there any other way to enable this w/o relying on init or systemd? @mrunalp @rhatdan ?

@mrunalp
Copy link
Collaborator

mrunalp commented Sep 13, 2016

Can't really assume anything about an image. So I think better docs should be the fix here.

On Sep 13, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Antonio Murdaca [email protected] wrote:

see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375661

is there any other way to enable this w/o relying on init or systemd? @mrunalp @rhatdan ?


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@runcom
Copy link
Author

runcom commented Sep 13, 2016

Can't really assume anything about an image. So I think better docs should be the fix here.

right

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 14, 2016

But where should these docs exists? Should we add information to docker run man pages? Docker Build?
If this user noticed the difference where would he look to figure out what is going on? Perhaps we should write more information to the log file saying oci-systemd-hook sees that you are running an init system as pid1 so it is mounting tmpfs on /run. If we had the automatic cp feature from the underlying /run onto the tmpfs, would the user have noticed?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jul 13, 2017

Closing this as I believe it is resolved.

@rhatdan rhatdan closed this as completed Jul 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants