Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Firefox browser occupies less memory compared to Chrome. Would it be feasible to use Firefox for web crawling? #1152

Open
nu0y4 opened this issue Jan 8, 2025 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.

Comments

@nu0y4
Copy link

nu0y4 commented Jan 8, 2025

When using Chrome for web crawling, my computer's CPU runs at full capacity, but Firefox handles it well. So, would it be feasible to use Firefox for web crawling, including page traversal and click operations?

@nu0y4 nu0y4 added the Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes. label Jan 8, 2025
@GeorginaReeder
Copy link

Thanks so much for your feature request @nu0y4 , we'll take a look into this!

@dogancanbakir dogancanbakir self-assigned this Jan 8, 2025
@dogancanbakir
Copy link
Member

I'll explore options to make this optional.

@dogancanbakir
Copy link
Member

@nu0y4 Thank you for opening the issue. After reviewing the underlying library we use in Katana for headless operations, I discovered that it does not support Firefox to the same extent as Chrome. Specific issues cannot be resolved due to Firefox’s limitations and the reduced activity in the library's development for this browser. I am eager to assist in improving the current implementation. Please provide details if anything specific can be undertaken, and I will look into them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Enhancement Most issues will probably ask for additions or changes.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants