We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The protobuf Bazel module depends on rules_jvm_external and it's including the artifacts it needs under the default maven repository name (@maven, https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/WORKSPACE#L65). This can create some issues for rules_jvm_external users, as described in bazel-contrib/rules_jvm_external#1168.
protobuf
rules_jvm_external
@maven
Is it necessary for these artifacts to be under the default maven repository name? Otherwise, could we use a different name for the maven repository so it won't conflict with other modules or users' projects (https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_jvm_external?tab=readme-ov-file#multiple-maven_installjson-files)? This should also lead to a better isolation of this module.
For example:
maven_install( name = "maven_protobuf", ... )
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Addressed in #19477
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The
protobuf
Bazel module depends onrules_jvm_external
and it's including the artifacts it needs under the default maven repository name (@maven
, https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/WORKSPACE#L65). This can create some issues forrules_jvm_external
users, as described in bazel-contrib/rules_jvm_external#1168.Is it necessary for these artifacts to be under the default maven repository name? Otherwise, could we use a different name for the maven repository so it won't conflict with other modules or users' projects (https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_jvm_external?tab=readme-ov-file#multiple-maven_installjson-files)? This should also lead to a better isolation of this module.
For example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: