Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comments ID Search Broken #92

Open
Randcd415 opened this issue Dec 9, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Comments ID Search Broken #92

Randcd415 opened this issue Dec 9, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@Randcd415
Copy link

Thanks for your work on this!

It looks like there's currently an issue with the id search on Pushshift, the example comments id search query provided in the Pushshift API documentation returns an Internal Server Error.

@dasavisha
Copy link

I am having the same issue.

@gurnec
Copy link

gurnec commented Dec 9, 2021

FYI according to this comment on Reddit:

reply from SITM

Yeah, I am moving that functionality to Elasticsearch because the Postgresql DB got too large for the ZFS array. I am anticipating that will be fixed in the next couple of days. We're doing some major revamping of the API to increase storage across the board and to make the cluster more redundant

The comment id search should hopefully be up before then though

ok thanks. I think I can fix that functionality by this evening / tomorrow morning at the latest

@dunovank
Copy link

dunovank commented May 8, 2022

Thanks for all the work on pushshift - really great resource. Curious as to status of id-based comment search and if there are any estimates on when it will be back up? Getting 0% Success Rate when search comments by id with pmaw.

This response to a related issue raised on pmaw repo suggests the issue is with the pushshift server (as opposed to an issue with the pmaw client).

@mlinegar
Copy link

Has there been any update on this? I haven't been able to successfully get any comment ids through pmaw.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants