-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No emit message in "missing whitespace around operator" #1110
Comments
I agree that we should have a message for this. |
I think we don't have to mimic any flake8 or PEP 8 message for that matter, it would be an effort spent on things which are already handled quite well by other tools. I use pep8 in combination with pylint all the time, since I don't expect pylint to follow PEP 8 to the heart. That is, if anyone is willing to provide the code for such a check, I would not mind adding in, but I don't want to spend time on implementing it either. |
It looks strange this bug is closed. {
"python.linting.enabled": true,
"python.linting.flake8Enabled": true,
"python.linting.flake8Args": [
],
} |
I'd suggest using |
Steps to reproduce
var = 3+0
flake8 --show-source --select=E226 file.py
file.py:1:6: E226 missing whitespace around arithmetic operator
pylint -d invalid-name,missing-docstring file.py
Current behaviour
Not emit messages.
Expected behaviour
Should we emit the message of
missing whitespace around operator
?pylint --version output
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: