You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now we only have an overview of hyper parameters where the reference implementation of the authors differ from paper. I wonder if we should put a table of every hyper parameter together with their values on top of the API reference. This way we could give a far better overview
If we go for this it might be viable to implement a HyperParameters class for each paper where we can pull all default values for all the functions and classes.
That's a good idea. It would also be good to document other paper relevant attitudes in this list? For example, the optimizer used, the dataset on which the training is/was performed, etc
Right now we only have an overview of hyper parameters where the reference implementation of the authors differ from paper. I wonder if we should put a table of every hyper parameter together with their values on top of the API reference. This way we could give a far better overview
If we go for this it might be viable to implement a
HyperParameters
class for each paper where we can pull all default values for all the functions and classes.Cc @jbueltemeier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: