-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Default TIMESTAMP converter in sqlite3 ignores UTC offset #89498
Comments
The SQLite converter that the sqlite3 library automatically registers for TIMESTAMP columns (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/main/Lib/sqlite3/dbapi2.py#L66) ignores the time zone even if it is present and always returns a naive datetime object. I think that the converter should return an aware object if the time zone is present in the database. As it is, round trips of TIMESTAMP values from the database to Python and back might erase the original time zone info. Now that datetime.datetime.fromisoformat is in Python 3.7, this should be easy to implement. |
Substitute "UTC offset" for "time zone" in my comment above. I have attached a minimal Python program demonstrating data loss from this bug. |
Replacing the timestamp converter with datetime.datetime.fromisoformat sounds good to me. |
Unfortunately fixing this will have to be considered a backwards-incompatible change, since Python doesn't allow naive and aware datetime objects to be compared, so if sqlite3 starts returning aware datetimes, existing code might break. Alternatively, perhaps this could be fixed in conjunction with changing sqlite3's API to allow per-database converters and adapters. Then, the old global TIMESTAMP converter could be retained for compatibility with existing code, and new code could opt-in to a per-database TIMESTAMP converter with the correct behavior. |
True.
Another option could be to deprecate the current behaviour and then change it to being timezone aware in Python 3.13. |
This sounds like the simplest option. I'd be interested in working on this myself, if you think it's something that a new CPython contributor could handle. |
Please, go ahead :) However, I think this should be discussed on Discourse first (open a topic in the Core Development category). |
Okay, I started a discussion here: https://discuss.python.org/t/fixing-sqlite-timestamp-converter-to-handle-utc-offsets/10985 |
Based on the decision from Discourse, the current behavior has only been documented and the actual issue is "wontfix". Thanks for pursuing this, Ian! ✨ 🍰 ✨ |
sqlite3
docs about "timestamp" converter #29200sqlite3
docs about "timestamp" converter (GH-29200) #29319sqlite3
docs about "timestamp" converter (GH-29200) #29320Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: