We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider this test case:
[case testClassDeferredStar] import lib [file lib.py] from other import * class C: x: int [file other.py] import lib
Currently the order of processing targets is like this:
lib
other
__main__
I think it should be possible to process such SCC without deferral at all. Couple ideas to achieve this:
missing_names
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently this affects two plugin test cases testTypeInAttrDeferredStar and testTypeInDataclassDeferredStar.
testTypeInAttrDeferredStar
testTypeInDataclassDeferredStar
Sorry, something went wrong.
It looks like we generally process modules in a very sub-optimal order. I'll see what happens if we reverse the order.
Fixed by #7163.
JukkaL
No branches or pull requests
Consider this test case:
Currently the order of processing targets is like this:
lib
other
lib
__main__
I think it should be possible to process such SCC without deferral at all. Couple ideas to achieve this:
missing_names
act per namespace (to avoid extra deferral in more complex scenarios)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: