We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trying to reopen or clone #7744 but didn't figure out how, so I created a new issue instead.
See #7744 for all the required information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The issue is about cases like this, which currently generate an error:
def foo(): data = { # error: Need type annotation for 'data' 'abc': {} }
I think that not generating an error here should just be the default behavior. This would be a logical continuation of changes introduced in #7530.
Sorry, something went wrong.
@msullivan @ilevkivskyi Do you agree with me?
If the function itself has no annotations then yes, it would make sense to not require annotations for locals.
No branches or pull requests
Trying to reopen or clone #7744 but didn't figure out how, so I created a new issue instead.
See #7744 for all the required information.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: