Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding UnZipperMapDataPipe #325

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

NivekT
Copy link
Contributor

@NivekT NivekT commented Mar 24, 2022

Stack from ghstack:

This MapDataPipe seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding MapDataPipe before actually doing it.

Differential Revision: D35979906

[ghstack-poisoned]
NivekT added 5 commits March 29, 2022 11:46
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@NivekT
Copy link
Contributor Author

NivekT commented Apr 26, 2022

@VitalyFedyunin @ejguan I updated this whole stack and it is ready to review, but not urgent. Look at this stack of PR if you have time.

@ejguan
Copy link
Contributor

ejguan commented Apr 26, 2022

@VitalyFedyunin @ejguan I updated this whole stack and it is ready to review, but not urgent. Look at this stack of PR if you have time.

I will take a look tmrw.

Copy link
Contributor

@ejguan ejguan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, looks good to me. Thank you

NivekT added 2 commits April 27, 2022 12:35
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
This `MapDataPipe` seems simple enough to add but we should talk about what is the general guideline for adding `MapDataPipe` before actually doing it.

[ghstack-poisoned]
@NivekT
Copy link
Contributor Author

NivekT commented Apr 27, 2022

@NivekT has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/NivekT/66/head branch May 6, 2022 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants