-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self) #388
Closed
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b1572f1
Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)
NivekT 02f30c7
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT 423b8c4
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT 810eb56
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT 2ba5ab8
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT 8ff1ad7
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT 5696072
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT 2b64ea7
Update on "Moving DataPipe buffers from __iter__ to instance (self)"
NivekT File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting enough the domain CI test for Vision started to fail for a previous commit of this PR. It is raising "ResourceWarning" as you can see in the link below.
https://github.com/pytorch/data/runs/6498262553?check_suite_focus=true
Perhaps we need clear the buffer when the iterator is exhausted? I am adding this line to see if the issue is resolved. Let me know if you have any other thoughts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just tried and clearing the buffer at the end of
__iter__
doesn't help.@pmeier Do you think this is related to
pytest
or something that is introduced in this PR?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference, here is the thread where we discussed a similar issue:
pytorch/vision#5801
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am going to ignore the warning and land this based on the previous investigation.