You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@mrossinek FYI I currently do not plan to work on adding Parameter support for PolynomialTensor, I suggest renaming this issue so it's specific to SparseLabelOp and creating a separate one for PolynomialTensor if necessary.
What should we add?
We would like to support parameterized operators. This would:
qiskit.circuit.Parameter
to enable parameterizationSparseLabelOp
(see SupportPolynomialTensor
(Parameter
can actually be injected right into the matrices)ParameterExpression
objects insidePolynomialTensor
#894)classes which contain those operators(see SupportParameterExpression
objects insidePolynomialTensor
#894)QubitMapper
andQubitConverter
algorithms
to deal with parameters (can be dealt of as a follow-up feature to this one)This depends on:
Hamiltonian
classes being able to have their returned objects ofsecond_q_op()
be modifiable (i.e. parameterizable). I have some ideas for this but will provide more details once ImplementFermionicOp.from_polynomial_tensor
#666 has a PR; during its development I will pay particular attention to this feature. (see SupportParameterExpression
objects insidePolynomialTensor
#894)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: