-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
are the default improve / review prompts optimized in the pro version? #1483
Comments
The default prompt in the pro version is similar, but there are additional features there, like best practices (and auto best practices), ticket compliance (JIRA), custom labels, suggestion tracking, and others, that enable more customization extra abilities, resulting in further improving the quality. |
/answer_issue |
Question:Hi there, I looked at the examples in your configuration, for instance this one for the reviewer prompt. They look great and detailed. My question is: for Pro users, are /review, /describe, or /improve further optimized like the above or are the prompts simpler / in need for further tweaking? Asked differently, what is the default prompt that pr-agent PRO uses for the tools and how good / detailed is it? Answer:Qodo Merge (PR-Agent Pro) uses the same detailed and optimized prompts as the open-source version for the core tools (/review, /describe, /improve). However, Qodo Merge provides additional benefits that enhance the effectiveness of these tools:
So while the base prompts are the same, Qodo Merge enhances their effectiveness through better model selection, context handling, and learning capabilities. Relevant Sources: |
Hi there,
I looked at the examples in your configuration, for instance this one for the reviewer prompt. They look great and detailed.
My question is: for Pro users, are
/review
,/describe
, or/improve
further optimized like the above or are the prompts simpler / in need for further tweaking?Asked differently, what is the default prompt that
pr-agent PRO
uses for the tools and how good / detailed is it?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: