Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support implicit multi-threading? #332

Open
Moelf opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Support implicit multi-threading? #332

Moelf opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Moelf
Copy link

Moelf commented Sep 7, 2021

Since Query.jl is already not iterating but using getindex, is it possible to support multi-threading? Either baked in or via some externally passed in "executor" style like FLoops.jl

As an example to Query-style thingy with multi-threading: https://root.cern/doc/master/classROOT_1_1RDataFrame.html

In Julia we can match and surpass their speed: https://github.com/Moelf/UnROOT_RDataFrame_MiniBenchmark

And using Query.jl to mimic the style is almost overhead-free: Moelf/UnROOT_RDataFrame_MiniBenchmark#1 (comment)

So I'm wondering if there's a chance we also get multi-threading in the last quadrant of the thred-query 2x2 matrix

Single thread Multi-threading
For-loop
Query-style

(check means Julia performance match or faster than C++)

@Moelf Moelf changed the title Support implicit multi threading? Support implicit multi-threading? Sep 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant