gdb bitching

[chairkov]

so, px/ works like gdb x/. comparing x/s and x/i, then we can see:

gdb:

(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400a02
(gdb) r
Starting program: /bin/core-grep 

Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000000400a02 in main ()
(gdb) x/40s 0x400a02
0x400a02 <main+4>:      "H\201\354", <incomplete sequence \340>
0x400a07 <main+9>:      ""
0x400a08 <main+10>:     ""

vs r2:

 -- nothing personal, just bitness
[0x7f77afa5ccd0]> db main
[0x7f77afa5ccd0]> dc
Selecting and continuing: 14214
hit breakpoint at: 4009fe
[0x004009fe]> x/40s 0x400a02
H
,H dH%(
HE1HH
D
<

so address prefix is missing

[chairkov]

@radare also, somwat odd: (I know it's not regs)

[0x004009fe]> x/40s rsp
Block size 483978792 is too big
This block size is too big. Did you mean 'px @ 40s rsp' instead?

[chairkov]

@pancake @radare doesn't work, no prefix shown

[radare]

it works now. , fuckoff wat? @pancake is nobody from r2land. can

[radare]

can u please add tests at least?

[chairkov]

@radare I know, great p was not from me, so ff....

[chairkov]

@radare @XVilka is px/ now equal to gdb x/ ?

[radare]

Yes . x is the short for px

…

On 15 May 2017, at 19:31, chairkov ***@***.***> wrote: @radare @XVilka is px/ now equal to gdb x/ ? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.