Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

compaction/better efficiency? #38

Open
redgeoff opened this issue Sep 14, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

compaction/better efficiency? #38

redgeoff opened this issue Sep 14, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@redgeoff
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@redgeoff
Copy link
Owner Author

Could this be improved by hosting app as CouchApp on Iris Couch servers? This would avoid having to use CORS, and cut down on half of the http requests: http://pouchdb.com/2014/08/29/pouchdb-3.0.3.html

@redgeoff redgeoff added question and removed question labels Dec 3, 2014
@aesculus
Copy link

aesculus commented Dec 4, 2014

Problem with compaction is you loose the history I would suspect, at least you do with revisions. This is one reason I like the concept of delta-pouch. I would like to use it to not only manage multiple disconnected updates to the same doc but keep track of when and who (userid?) made each change for a historical log. Is handy for legal reasons but also for backing out changes that might not be appropriate (ie time sequence of posting versus synching or authority overrides).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants