-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restructure "Ecosystem" docs page #2588
Comments
Another rough thoughts and reviews: I'd suggest changing "Using Redux" to "Tools & Resources" or something like that.
No broken links, but I will check it out later if any Github repositories' links can be a link to a website that was created after the Ecosystem file was written.
We actually have this "More" session in the end of the file... I think that by just removing it from the top should do. |
Suggestion: This issue seems interesting, can I work on this? |
Got started on this task tonight. My first step is to remove all the "learning"-type links from the Ecosystem page, and create a new "Learning Resources" page. At the moment, I'm mostly dropping the existing links entirely, and creating a new set of links that's based off the categories and entries in my React/Redux links list. From there, I plan to fill out the new Ecosystem page in a style that's similar to my ReactBoston slides on the Redux ecosystem. The goal is to show some of the categories of libraries that are out there, highlight some of the "best" or most widely-used addons in each category, and give information on when and why you might want to use them. |
The "Ecosystem" page is currently a bit of a scattershot list (current version for reference). There's a mixture of random tutorial links, translations, bindings, middleware, and other addons.
The page describes itself as "staff picks", and also that "the Redux staff has vetted them personally". Really, at this point that's not exactly true. We've had lots of people submit their own libs over time, and while someone did presumably approve each merged PR, I'm not sure we really "vetted" things per se.
On a similar note, there's a great quote from Andrew and Dan at #215 (comment):
I don't think we're going to actually maintain any additional libs at this point, but we can certainly highlight ones that are widely used or specifically interesting in some better ways.
I talked with Dan at ReactRally about revamping this page. I don't have an absolutely specific plan in mind yet, but some rough thoughts:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: