Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Building of static libraries is broken #53

Closed
s-ludwig opened this issue Mar 19, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Building of static libraries is broken #53

s-ludwig opened this issue Mar 19, 2013 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member

See SiegeLord/DAllegro5#13. Building a static library currently uses the same separate compile/link steps as for normal builds. It should just use -lib instead and drop the linking stage.

@tavi-cacina
Copy link
Contributor

Also using a staticLibrary package as a dependency does not work as expected. It is not the generated lib that gets integrated in the main package, but all the lib's source files. Thus the lib dependency acts like a sourceLibrary.

@eskimor
Copy link

eskimor commented Apr 19, 2013

Also true for executable dependencies as pointed out by: Nick Sabalausky

@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member Author

I think executable dependencies might be a (slightly) different thing than library dependencies, as the same package can have library and application configurations at the same time, which obviously creates a conflict here if both are needed for some reason (not likely, but probably still better to avoid introducing artificial limitations).

@s-ludwig
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed since 0.9.21.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants