-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Include gaps in coverage plots #314
Comments
Thanks for the issue @filups - Sorry for any confusion: this is a great place to open issues regarding bugs, features, use cases, etc. Not just bug reports. @geanders do you have any thoughts on this? plotting stuff is not one of my skills, and you were the original author of this i think it makes sense to me to make this change to account for gaps |
@filups if you have time, could you send a pull request with your proposed changes? |
I'll see what I can do. Could you save me a bit of time by pointing me towards where I can find the code for the |
great, thanks.
|
I (finally) started working on this, but I'm not sure if I can stay within the confines of the |
@philipshirk Great, glad to hear it. Looks like |
I'm not sure if this really belongs in the issues or the forum, since it's more a feature request than a bug, but here it goes. In some cases stations are missing a lot of data, making the
autoplot()
of ameteo_coverage
object very misleading. For example:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: