Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tabulate MIQE requirements addressed by tidyqpcr, from @wolski review #125

Closed
ewallace opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #148
Closed

Tabulate MIQE requirements addressed by tidyqpcr, from @wolski review #125

ewallace opened this issue Dec 6, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #148
Assignees
Labels
rOpensci-review To fix for rOpensci review, December 2021

Comments

@ewallace
Copy link
Collaborator

ewallace commented Dec 6, 2021

Software review by @wolski ropensci/software-review#470 (comment)
suggests:

Also, I would like to understand better what do you mean "overlook best-practices in qPCR experiments"? Indeed, you refer to the "MIQE best-practice compliant experimental design". MIQE is a checklist of requirements to publish a qPCR experiment.
There is Table 1 in the publication about MIQE you have referenced. Would you maybe tabulate which MIQE requirements "tidyqpcr" already covers using which functions, which would improve the package documentation? I am aware that this is a lot to ask, but could you please include the CRAN alternatives in this table to give substance to your claim that those alternatives of tidyqpcr overlook best practices. Most likely, you can reuse this table in an upcoming publication of tidyqpcr.

Let's do that.

@ewallace ewallace added the rOpensci-review To fix for rOpensci review, December 2021 label Dec 17, 2021
@DimmestP DimmestP self-assigned this Jan 12, 2022
@ewallace ewallace linked a pull request Feb 4, 2022 that will close this issue
@jooolia
Copy link
Member

jooolia commented Mar 18, 2022

Hello, I am looking through the changes and wanted to note that this table is very useful and clarifies the functionality of tidyqpcr compared to other packages.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rOpensci-review To fix for rOpensci review, December 2021
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants