Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Converter should handle functional_position and functional_state #59

Open
emiltin opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Converter should handle functional_position and functional_state #59

emiltin opened this issue May 2, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@emiltin
Copy link
Contributor

emiltin commented May 2, 2023 •
edited
Loading

It currently ignores them because they are not used in the TLC sxl.
@emiltin emiltin changed the title Convert should handle functional_position and functional_state Converter should handle functional_position and functional_state May 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@emiltin