Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing policy Index in state_posterior? #3

Open
AkahoshiT opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Missing policy Index in state_posterior? #3

AkahoshiT opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@AkahoshiT
Copy link

AkahoshiT commented May 14, 2024

lnAs = md_dot((lnA),state_posterior{fj}(:,tau),fj);

Hello!

I believe that the state_posterior need policy index in this line, like so: lnAs = md_dot((lnA), state_posterior{fj}(:, tau, policy), fj);.
Currently, the first policy at t=1 gets a higher free energy than the others. (F(1,1) > F(2~5,1))

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant