Rollup merge of #118191 - estebank:let-chain-typo, r=compiler-errors

Suggest `let` or `==` on typo'd let-chain

When encountering a bare assignment in a let-chain, suggest turning the
assignment into a `let` expression or an equality check.

```
error: expected expression, found `let` statement
  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:5:8
   |
LL |     if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
   |        ^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions
help: you might have meant to continue the let-chain
   |
LL |     if let x = 1 && let i = 2 {}
   |                     +++
help: you might have meant to compare for equality
   |
LL |     if let x = 1 && i == 2 {}
   |                        +
```

compiler/rustc_parse/messages.ftl

@@ -492,9 +492,13 @@ parse_match_arm_body_without_braces = `match` arm body without braces
         } with a body
     .suggestion_use_comma_not_semicolon = replace `;` with `,` to end a `match` arm expression
 
+parse_maybe_comparison = you might have meant to compare for equality
+
 parse_maybe_fn_typo_with_impl = you might have meant to write `impl` instead of `fn`
     .suggestion = replace `fn` with `impl` here
 
+parse_maybe_missing_let = you might have meant to continue the let-chain
+
 parse_maybe_recover_from_bad_qpath_stage_2 =
     missing angle brackets in associated item path
     .suggestion = types that don't start with an identifier need to be surrounded with angle brackets in qualified paths

compiler/rustc_parse/src/errors.rs

@@ -415,6 +415,32 @@ pub(crate) struct ExpectedExpressionFoundLet {
     pub span: Span,
     #[subdiagnostic]
     pub reason: ForbiddenLetReason,
+    #[subdiagnostic]
+    pub missing_let: Option<MaybeMissingLet>,
+    #[subdiagnostic]
+    pub comparison: Option<MaybeComparison>,
+}
+
+#[derive(Subdiagnostic, Clone, Copy)]
+#[multipart_suggestion(
+    parse_maybe_missing_let,
+    applicability = "maybe-incorrect",
+    style = "verbose"
+)]
+pub(crate) struct MaybeMissingLet {
+    #[suggestion_part(code = "let ")]
+    pub span: Span,
+}
+
+#[derive(Subdiagnostic, Clone, Copy)]
+#[multipart_suggestion(
+    parse_maybe_comparison,
+    applicability = "maybe-incorrect",
+    style = "verbose"
+)]
+pub(crate) struct MaybeComparison {
+    #[suggestion_part(code = "=")]
+    pub span: Span,
 }
 
 #[derive(Diagnostic)]

compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+// ignore-tidy-filelength
 use super::diagnostics::SnapshotParser;
 use super::pat::{CommaRecoveryMode, Expected, RecoverColon, RecoverComma};
 use super::ty::{AllowPlus, RecoverQPath, RecoverReturnSign};
@@ -2477,7 +2478,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
         let mut cond =
             self.parse_expr_res(Restrictions::NO_STRUCT_LITERAL | Restrictions::ALLOW_LET, None)?;
 
-        CondChecker { parser: self, forbid_let_reason: None }.visit_expr(&mut cond);
+        CondChecker::new(self).visit_expr(&mut cond);
 
         if let ExprKind::Let(_, _, _, None) = cond.kind {
             // Remove the last feature gating of a `let` expression since it's stable.
@@ -2493,6 +2494,8 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
             let err = errors::ExpectedExpressionFoundLet {
                 span: self.token.span,
                 reason: ForbiddenLetReason::OtherForbidden,
+                missing_let: None,
+                comparison: None,
             };
             if self.prev_token.kind == token::BinOp(token::Or) {
                 // This was part of a closure, the that part of the parser recover.
@@ -2876,7 +2879,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
                 let if_span = this.prev_token.span;
                 let mut cond = this.parse_match_guard_condition()?;
 
-                CondChecker { parser: this, forbid_let_reason: None }.visit_expr(&mut cond);
+                CondChecker::new(this).visit_expr(&mut cond);
 
                 let (has_let_expr, does_not_have_bin_op) = check_let_expr(&cond);
                 if has_let_expr {
@@ -3552,6 +3555,14 @@ pub(crate) enum ForbiddenLetReason {
 struct CondChecker<'a> {
     parser: &'a Parser<'a>,
     forbid_let_reason: Option<ForbiddenLetReason>,
+    missing_let: Option<errors::MaybeMissingLet>,
+    comparison: Option<errors::MaybeComparison>,
+}
+
+impl<'a> CondChecker<'a> {
+    fn new(parser: &'a Parser<'a>) -> Self {
+        CondChecker { parser, forbid_let_reason: None, missing_let: None, comparison: None }
+    }
 }
 
 impl MutVisitor for CondChecker<'_> {
@@ -3562,11 +3573,13 @@ impl MutVisitor for CondChecker<'_> {
         match e.kind {
             ExprKind::Let(_, _, _, ref mut is_recovered @ None) => {
                 if let Some(reason) = self.forbid_let_reason {
-                    *is_recovered = Some(
-                        self.parser
-                            .sess
-                            .emit_err(errors::ExpectedExpressionFoundLet { span, reason }),
-                    );
+                    *is_recovered =
+                        Some(self.parser.sess.emit_err(errors::ExpectedExpressionFoundLet {
+                            span,
+                            reason,
+                            missing_let: self.missing_let,
+                            comparison: self.comparison,
+                        }));
                 } else {
                     self.parser.sess.gated_spans.gate(sym::let_chains, span);
                 }
@@ -3590,9 +3603,28 @@ impl MutVisitor for CondChecker<'_> {
                 noop_visit_expr(e, self);
                 self.forbid_let_reason = forbid_let_reason;
             }
+            ExprKind::Assign(ref lhs, _, span) => {
+                let forbid_let_reason = self.forbid_let_reason;
+                self.forbid_let_reason = Some(OtherForbidden);
+                let missing_let = self.missing_let;
+                if let ExprKind::Binary(_, _, rhs) = &lhs.kind
+                    && let ExprKind::Path(_, _)
+                    | ExprKind::Struct(_)
+                    | ExprKind::Call(_, _)
+                    | ExprKind::Array(_) = rhs.kind
+                {
+                    self.missing_let =
+                        Some(errors::MaybeMissingLet { span: rhs.span.shrink_to_lo() });
+                }
+                let comparison = self.comparison;
+                self.comparison = Some(errors::MaybeComparison { span: span.shrink_to_hi() });
+                noop_visit_expr(e, self);
+                self.forbid_let_reason = forbid_let_reason;
+                self.missing_let = missing_let;
+                self.comparison = comparison;
+            }
             ExprKind::Unary(_, _)
             | ExprKind::Await(_, _)
-            | ExprKind::Assign(_, _, _)
             | ExprKind::AssignOp(_, _, _)
             | ExprKind::Range(_, _, _)
             | ExprKind::Try(_)

tests/ui/expr/if/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,3 @@
-// FIXME(compiler-errors): This really should suggest `let` on the RHS of the
-// `&&` operator, but that's kinda hard to do because of precedence.
-// Instead, for now we just make sure not to suggest `if let let`.
 fn a() {
     if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
     //~^ ERROR cannot find value `i` in this scope

tests/ui/expr/if/bad-if-let-suggestion.stderr

@@ -1,19 +1,27 @@
 error: expected expression, found `let` statement
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:5:8
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:2:8
    |
 LL |     if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
    |        ^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions
+help: you might have meant to continue the let-chain
+   |
+LL |     if let x = 1 && let i = 2 {}
+   |                     +++
+help: you might have meant to compare for equality
+   |
+LL |     if let x = 1 && i == 2 {}
+   |                        +
 
 error[E0425]: cannot find value `i` in this scope
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:5:21
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:2:21
    |
 LL |     if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
    |                     ^ not found in this scope
 
 error[E0425]: cannot find value `i` in this scope
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:12:9
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:9:9
    |
 LL | fn a() {
    | ------ similarly named function `a` defined here
@@ -22,7 +30,7 @@ LL |     if (i + j) = i {}
    |         ^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `a`
 
 error[E0425]: cannot find value `j` in this scope
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:12:13
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:9:13
    |
 LL | fn a() {
    | ------ similarly named function `a` defined here
@@ -31,7 +39,7 @@ LL |     if (i + j) = i {}
    |             ^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `a`
 
 error[E0425]: cannot find value `i` in this scope
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:12:18
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:9:18
    |
 LL | fn a() {
    | ------ similarly named function `a` defined here
@@ -40,7 +48,7 @@ LL |     if (i + j) = i {}
    |                  ^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `a`
 
 error[E0425]: cannot find value `x` in this scope
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:19:8
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:16:8
    |
 LL | fn a() {
    | ------ similarly named function `a` defined here
@@ -49,7 +57,7 @@ LL |     if x[0] = 1 {}
    |        ^ help: a function with a similar name exists: `a`
 
 error[E0308]: mismatched types
-  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:5:8
+  --> $DIR/bad-if-let-suggestion.rs:2:8
    |
 LL |     if let x = 1 && i = 2 {}
    |        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `bool`, found `()`

tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/invalid-let-in-a-valid-let-context.stderr

@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ LL |         if let Some(elem) = _opt && [1, 2, 3][let _ = &&let Some(x) = Some(
    |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions
+help: you might have meant to compare for equality
+   |
+LL |         if let Some(elem) = _opt && [1, 2, 3][let _ = &&let Some(x) = Some(42)] == 1 {
+   |                                                                                  +
 
 error: expected expression, found `let` statement
   --> $DIR/invalid-let-in-a-valid-let-context.rs:24:23
@@ -53,6 +57,10 @@ LL |         if let Some(elem) = _opt && [1, 2, 3][let _ = ()] = 1 {
    |            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    |
    = note: only supported directly in conditions of `if` and `while` expressions
+help: you might have meant to compare for equality
+   |
+LL |         if let Some(elem) = _opt && [1, 2, 3][let _ = ()] == 1 {
+   |                                                            +
 
 error: expected expression, found `let` statement
   --> $DIR/invalid-let-in-a-valid-let-context.rs:42:21